Juiza do acre que bloqueou a telexfree bankruptcy

juiza do acre que bloqueou a telexfree bankruptcy

Jornal GGN – O Diário de Justiça do Acre publicou intimação ao advogado Horst Vilmar Fuches, que representa a empresa Ympactus, conhecida pelo nome fantasia Telexfree e seus sócios, dando ciência do bloqueio de valores contidos em conta corrente, no valor de R$ 6 bilhões.A intimação visa efetivar a medida de bloqueio de valores requerida pelo Ministério Público do Acre, em. IG: A juíza Thaís Khalil, que em 18 de junho determinou a suspensão dos pagamentos da Telexfree, está sendo ameaçada de morte. Segundo o promotor Rodrigo Curti, do Ministério Público do Acre (MP-AC), anônimos também promteram matar os filhos e o marido da juíza. “Foram ameaças diretas, de morte e sequestro, por e-mail, telefone, Facebook”, . A juíza Thaís Khalil, que determinou a suspensão dos pagamentos da Telexfree, está sofrendo ameaças de morte, segundo o promotor Rodrigo Curti, do Ministério Público do Acre (MP-AC. juiza do acre que bloqueou a telexfree bankruptcy

How long the Trustee will take to sift through the mountain of information requested is unclear. Any objections are to be filed before June 20th, with a hearing scheduled for June 24th. If no objections are filed, the order will be granted presumably without a hearing. I would bet the chance is pretty close to zero, because the retail sales are pretty close to zero.

I would bet the chance is pretty close to zero. There are 2 bats Ackman has against HLF. Since so few MLMs have external sales that make up a significant part of their profit, the regulators should require the MLMs to report this information instead of letting them run loose by the hundreds and pick off one or two occasionally.

I would be willing to bet the insurance company has a clause that states illegal activity will nullify the policy, and they will soon drop TF like a wet dishrag. Yo, Joaquim Pedrosa, stop being an ass dude! Lets not act like religious fundamentalists, when that shitty company is not even a religion! Despite some of the pastors of the evangelical churches, being indeed salesmen, and acting has such,by peddling forth telexfree!

In Brazil. No comment on the many manipulative tactics that C. Which has a looong past of manipulation and genocide. Sec waited a long time in order to gather all the necessary evidence to properly stop Telexfree in its tracks. I believe they took too much time actually. At this end of a long running fraud such as Telexfree, those behind it have two major advantages:.

Stephen D. Stephan B. Macht nichts. Oz : Well worth a read:. This is like a drug dealer talking about his feet being swollen from the long days standing on the street corner in the heat and calling it hard work. If his beloved brother-in-law is not afraid to face justice, why is he hidding like a girl in Brazil?

What a rat. Wanzeler: Hey Jim, You want to get out of here and go hang out in Brazil? I thought Merrill was caught on a highway, between two major airports. Tex : I thought Merrill was caught on a highway, between two major airports. Oz, this site there and identical to the original site of Telexfree. It would also make sense he stayed away from the main route and take a secondary road, in order to not be as visible.

I always thought nabbing him there was strange. They had to have been following him to make that arrest, otherwise what are the chances of some random patrol pulling him over? Katia Wanzeler I can understand, she was nabbed at the airport and HSI was called in by security staff. The authorities have never alleged that he was driving to an airport, or that he possessed his passport, a ticket or luggage when arrested even though they have had the motive and opportunity to do so.

Can I get some clarification from a Portuguese-speaker re. Foi concedido o prazo de 60 dias para a empresa apresentar o laudo [o prazo termina nesta segunda-feira, dia 16]. The period of 60 days for the company to present the award [the deadline ends on Monday, 16] was granted.

Or is the report still due to be presented today 16th? Oz : Can I get some clarification from a Portuguese-speaker re. If one or both parts choose to do so, a new deadline will be set to those assistants to analyse all the documents and present their own reports, that will be attached to the lawsuit, so the judge will have to read the 3 reports, before deciding.

Judge Thais says once she receives the report, she will notify TF and MPAC and then their own experts will have some time to present their analysis. Tex : a probable place for him to be arrested. Evidence submitted by the SEC shows Wanzeler suspected his e-mail had been hacked.

Factually, the Feds knew Merrill and Katia went to the bank together to get the checks. Those checks ended up in the possession of Craft who e-mailed that he was prepared to leave headquarters and deposit them in a safe box. Speculatively, Wanzeler alert to the e-mail monitoring and the raid at headquarters flees in a car other than his own and Merrill is arrested on sight probably in his own car. Surveillance on Katia continues and she is nabbed trying to join her husband. It looks more like the Keystone Cops to me.

Then I see them patting each other on their backs, nearly breaking their arms, claiming what a great catch they made, while even bigger MLM scam fish swim right in front of them, such as Amway and Herbalife.

Why spend a small fortune prosecuting him, only to then feed and house him for years. As gone as if he were in prison and at no cost. Let the Brazilians deal with him. There are other fish to fry. If true, why not let Merrill go for the same reason? And let his wife go back to be with him? I do not doubt that if Wanzeler had been home when the arrest warrant was served that he would have been taken into custody as per procedure. Justice demands that, but the fact is that he was not at home and his wife told the arresting officers he was in a local hotel.

I think so. If he falls into their lap then of course they will arrest and prosecute but how much of a priority should the authorities give to one guy sitting behind an extradition treaty in Brazil? Whether the authorities fouled up and let him slip away is an internal matter for the police to decide.

I chalk it up to win some… lose some. Wanzeler got lucky. It did not cost much. Running as he did potentially saves the US the cost of a trial and years of incarceration.

Its not a bad outcome pragmatically speaking. It pisses me off to no end to see that scumbag Wanzeler escape with all his stolen money. It really sucks bad! Goodbrain : It pisses me off to no end to see that scumbag Wanzeler escape with all his stolen money. It seems a little early to draw such a conclusion. If I recall he has had a personal residence, expensive cars, a yacht, and 36 rental homes and a life in the US. The Feds have identified several foreign bank accounts. So while for now he has escaped criminal arrest the civil prosecution goes on and every thing he ever had or owned is subject to being lost.

Everything the U. WOW thats incredible the amount of lies that come out of there mouths is sad …. The court website was hacked? Costa holds up a whole ton of documents but does not discuss the crucial tax revenue filings, which is what the Judge used to rule on amongst other things. They appear to have shot themselves in the foot on that front likely running affiliate revenues through TelexFree, with Ympactus only serving as a front for the TelexFree Ponzi, hence bugger all revenue until recently.

Hearing maybe Friday or more likely early next week. Did you hear that Pinky? This time will be different, we simply cannot fail! Perhaps TF can produce a new document signed by GOD to prove in court that they are not an elaborate ponzie scheme.

This is false news! Hackers attacked the Court Justice website! Telexfree affiliates should feel insulted by Costa. This guy insults thier intelligence everytime he opens his mouth. He obviously thinks their such blithering morons that they will believe this stuff.

Well, there was the Best Western thing, and then the insurance, oh and then……. Sigh, Unbelievable. If Brazilian procedures are consistent with those used in the US, such a schedule would reflect the amount owed to creditors promoters etc.

I found the same description in some of the translated sources. It was mentioned in the court notice, as one of the reasons for why the bankruptcy protection was denied. The different law firms are only owed a more standard salary R20, — R60, Carlos Costa can be really generous. Probably a law firm. They are owed 7. No doubt is an inflated number that will be challenged eventually.

As it sits now they appear not to have been paid and the way things are going they will become an unsecured creditor in any dissolution. Can someone explain to me why Telexfree USA is still up and running and recruiting new victims?. I have several friends who signed up and are convincing me of singing with Telexfree. Please HELP!!! Anyone can see that the hundreds of millions of dollars owed is progressively spiralling out of control in true Ponzi style.

It seems pretty clear that a lot of money was due to and probably collected by the owners of the trademark Telexfree.

Nothing that I have seen enjoins the trademark owners from selling, licensing or generally capitalizing on the trademark wherever they can. Such licensing can certainly include geographic restrictions, consulting fees, commissions etc. The trademark is in some respect being franchised. Who operates the franchise in the US is unknown to me.

In the video, Costa confirms the breaking of the contract of service between Telexfree and Ympactus, but does not detail what it means for the company. Lol at severing ties with yourself, James Merril is listed as an owner of both lolol.

These guys are class act clowns. Paralyzed for three months on charges of running a financial pyramid, Ympactus Commercial, better known as Telexfree, informed the Court that has accumulated a debt of U. Most debts, U. Simon : Can someone explain to me why Telexfree USA is still up and running and recruiting new victims?. It will eventually be shut down by authorities or it will run out of investors.

The owners are defendants in the case in Brazil. A quick look at the headlines June 18th — current date will give you a quick overview for the situation in Brazil 14 lost appeals till date. If you want to update your friends about something something that potentially can affect them , then I can only offer you some vague information about an upcoming trial in Brazil.

We know there is an upcoming trial there in the beginning of October, but it can be delayed for 4 weeks. We know too little about the charge sheet there. Ympactus may hope to limit the scope of their exposure, admit to a few minor offenses, and pay a fine in hope of keeping the company afloat. Its noteworthy that the creditor list contains what appears to be an architectural development firm.

Add to that, the rumor that they are willing to cancel their affiliation with Telexfree and it may be speculated that they want to present a very cleaned up appearance to the Prosecutors Office without the Telexfree baggage as they attempt to bargain for a settlement that will save Ympactus as a going concern.

Present squeaky clean company to the PP, enter into a plea bargain, pay off whatever fines come your way with stolen Ponzi money… And then what? Good luck plea bargaining your way out of that…. All the papers Carlos Costa show in his videos were indeed presented to the judge. The original source is a link posted by one of the Brazilians, posted in the same section of a thread where the 87 page scanned initial complaint from Acre PP was posted.

Original source link disabled , notice 13 from the top: diario. Holy crap when did that happen!? Oz : … And then what? I doubt the prosecutor would agree to terms allowing for that. Maybe TelexFree could just hack the court website and bypass having to argue the prosecutor in court altogether. As I recall the actual amount frozen was considerably less. Oz : Maybe TelexFree could just hack the court website and bypass having to argue the prosecutor in court altogether. Well if the National Security Agency of the United States is able and willing to hack into the diplomatic communications of the President of Brazil, I suppose it does not seem so far fetched to the more primitive divulgadore that secret government agents are hacking away at the Ympactus bankruptcy files.

One of them, according to the agency, is that the suggestion lacks a complete list of investors in the scheme with the respective amounts invested. Emilio Rubens :Bbom still blocked. IT was good, because now for the first time we can see some BBom affiliates really pissed at the company. Before they were only pissed at the Brazilian Justice…. In other words he want people to sell just like Avon or Mary Kay companies.

Robson : In other words he want people to sell just like Avon or Mary Kay companies. BTW, the audience here is assumed to be international all types of languages.

We will look at factual content rather than at grammar and spelling. This value was just the limit established by court order. Looks like new appeals are going to both the Superior and Federal Courts. TelexFree has previously had appeals filed in both courts rejected, on the grounds that they cannot intervene in a case currently being heard in a lower court until it is concluded. They filed a motion requesting the shifting of burden of proof, meaning TelexFree would have to prove they are not a Ponzi scheme as opposed to the PP proving they were.

According to the magistrate, it is up to the institution to collect and present evidence proving the existence of a financial pyramid scheme in Telexfree. The magistrate explained that this does not translate into an advantage for Telexfree, because it is only an initial definition of rules to be followed in the coming legal process.

The case is pretty much slamdunk with zero external revenue and affiliates simply paying eachother. The only thing I can come up with is they might have been trying to speed up the process. Not that I understand the Brazilian court system,- chang. Except that they have already, no less than fifteen times; once at the injunction hearing and fourteen times in subsequent appeals. All fourteen appeals were denied along with the initial Acre injunction being granted as a direct result of evidence presented by the PP in court.

The normal rule is that the party presenting a claim has to prove it. The Public Prosecutor have probably not received all information requested from all the defendants, and are asking for reverse Burden of Proof.

The Court denied that, the potentially missing information can be collected in other ways by using proper procedures. New subpoenas will have to be sent out, collecting the potentially missing information. Missing information can be used as evidence in itself, e. The new subpoena will eliminate potential misunderstandings. Oz : The case is pretty much slamdunk with zero external revenue and affiliates simply paying eachother. It makes some sense in the explanation I gave. That logical method will often be close to correct in its conclusion, but not in all the details.

It will fail if you add too much from your own imagination rather than from actual knowledge. One or more of the defendants have probably failed to produce the requested evidence, e. The PP have delivered inconclusive evidence because of the missing information from the defendants, and are asking for that to be accepted as valid evidence. The August 12th hearing backed it up with a charge sheet, making the injunction become permanent until further order. One failed attempt to collect evidence from a party can be related to misunderstandings.

Two failed attempts will show that the party is unwilling or unable to produce the requested evidence. Ironicaly, Telexfree escaped the Burden of Proof because the court considered that they were too far from having a true consuption relation with their affiliates, although they should have one.

1 thoughts on “Juiza do acre que bloqueou a telexfree bankruptcy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *